Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Flattery's avatar

A book in this line of thinking that has been helpful to me is Ken Stanley's 'Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned.' His incrementalism analogy is that of stepping stones.

For example, a crucial stepping stone in the invention of the computer was (of all things), the noble vacuum tube:

"In fact, if you were alive in 1750 with the objective of building some kind of computer, you’d never think of inventing a vacuum tube first. Even after vacuum tubes were first discovered, no one would realize their application to computation for over 100 years. The problem is that the stepping stone does not resemble the final product. Vacuum tubes on their own just don’t make people think about computers. But strangely enough, as history would have it vacuum tubes are right next to computers in the great room of all possible inventions—once you’ve got vacuum tubes you’re very close to having computers, if only you could see the connection. The problem is, who would think of that in advance? The arrangement, or structure, of this search space is completely unpredictable."

Expand full comment
John Jenkins's avatar

Amen. Step by step...and its corollary: Plod on...plod on...plod on.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts